Telegram API: Webhook vs Long Polling
Compare the two main methods for receiving Telegram updates. Learn the pros, cons, performance differences, and when to use each approach for your bot development.
Overview: Two Ways to Receive Updates
When building Telegram bots, you have two primary methods to receive updates from the Telegram servers: Webhooks and Long Polling. Each method has distinct advantages and trade-offs that make them suitable for different scenarios.
🔗 Webhook Method
Telegram sends updates directly to your server endpoint in real-time via HTTP POST requests.
🔄 Long Polling Method
Your bot actively requests updates from Telegram servers at regular intervals using getUpdates API.
Webhook Method Deep Dive
Webhooks provide a push-based approach where Telegram automatically sends updates to your specified HTTPS endpoint whenever new messages or events occur. This creates a real-time, event-driven architecture.
How Webhooks Work:
- You register your HTTPS endpoint with Telegram using
setWebhook - When users interact with your bot, Telegram immediately sends a POST request to your endpoint
- Your server processes the update and responds with HTTP 200 OK
- No polling or waiting required - updates arrive instantly
HTTPS Requirement
Webhooks require a valid HTTPS certificate. Self-signed certificates won't work in production.
Long Polling Method Deep Dive
Long polling uses a pull-based approach where your bot regularly checks for new updates by calling the getUpdates method. The "long" in long polling refers to keeping the connection open until updates arrive or a timeout occurs.
How Long Polling Works:
- Your bot sends a
getUpdatesrequest to Telegram - If updates are available, Telegram responds immediately
- If no updates, Telegram keeps the connection open for up to
timeoutseconds - Your bot processes updates and repeats the cycle
Development Friendly
Perfect for local development, testing, and scenarios where you can't set up HTTPS.
Side-by-Side Comparison
🔗 Webhook
Real-time, event-driven approach with instant update delivery
✅ Pros
- •Instant real-time updates
- •Lower server resource usage
- •Better scalability for high-traffic bots
- •No constant polling overhead
- •More efficient for production apps
❌ Cons
- •Requires HTTPS and valid SSL certificate
- •More complex server setup
- •Harder to debug and test locally
- •Need public-facing server
- •Dependency on webhook endpoint uptime
🎯 Best For
- •Production applications
- •High-traffic bots
- •Real-time chat applications
- •E-commerce bots requiring instant responses
- •Bots with time-sensitive notifications
🔄 Long Polling
Pull-based approach with regular update checking
✅ Pros
- •Simple setup and implementation
- •Works without HTTPS
- •Great for development and testing
- •No need for public server
- •Easy to debug and monitor
❌ Cons
- •Higher server resource usage
- •Slight delay in receiving updates
- •Constant network connections
- •Less efficient for high-traffic scenarios
- •Potential for missed updates if bot crashes
🎯 Best For
- •Development and testing
- •Low-traffic bots
- •Local development environments
- •Bots behind firewalls or NAT
- •Simple personal projects
Performance Analysis
Latency
Webhook: ~100ms
Polling: ~1-30s
Resource Usage
Webhook: Low
Polling: Medium-High
Scalability
Webhook: Excellent
Polling: Limited
Performance Recommendations
Choose Webhook When:
- • Expecting >100 messages per day
- • Real-time responses are critical
- • Running in production environment
- • Need to minimize server costs
Choose Long Polling When:
- • Developing or testing locally
- • Low message volume (<50/day)
- • Can't set up HTTPS easily
- • Simple prototype or MVP
Quick Implementation Guide
🔗 Setting Up Webhook
https://api.telegram.org/bot<TOKEN>/setWebhook \
-d url=https://yourserver.com/webhook
Your endpoint must respond with HTTP 200 and handle POST requests with JSON payloads.
🔄 Setting Up Long Polling
getUpdates?timeout=30&offset=<OFFSET>"
Implement a loop that calls getUpdates continuously, updating the offset with each batch.
Decision Matrix: Which Method to Choose?
| Scenario | Recommended | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Production bot with high traffic | Webhook | Real-time responses, lower resource usage |
| Local development & testing | Long Polling | No HTTPS required, easier debugging |
| E-commerce bot with instant orders | Webhook | Time-sensitive transactions need immediate processing |
| Personal bot with <10 users | Long Polling | Simple setup, low traffic doesn't justify webhook complexity |
| Corporate bot behind firewall | Long Polling | Outbound connections allowed, inbound webhook blocked |
| 24/7 customer support bot | Webhook | Always-on service requires instant response capability |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for production: Webhook or Long Polling?
Can I switch from Long Polling to Webhook later?
Do webhooks require HTTPS?
What happens if my webhook endpoint is down?
Can I use both methods simultaneously?
Related Articles
What is Telegram API?
Basics, features, and use cases for Telegram Bot API development.
Get Your API Key
Step-by-step guide to obtain your Telegram bot token with screenshots.
Build Bot with Node.js
Complete coding tutorial for creating Telegram bots using Node.js.
Security & Rate Limits
API restrictions, best practices, and safe usage guidelines.
Ready to implement your Telegram bot?
Whether you choose webhooks or long polling, Wapiuu provides the tools to build, deploy, and scale your Telegram automation.